Lagos APC Crisis: Samuel Ajose Challenges Consensus Move Backing Obafemi Hamzat

Spread the love

Fresh controversy is brewing within the Lagos chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as disagreements emerge over how the party intends to choose its governorship candidate for 2027. At the center of the dispute is aspirant Samuel Ajose, who has openly questioned the credibility of a consensus arrangement reportedly favoring Obafemi Hamzat.

Confusion Over Nomination Process

The unfolding situation has raised eyebrows among party stakeholders, especially aspirants who had already committed resources to the race. Samuel Ajose expressed frustration that nomination forms were sold to multiple contenders despite what now appears to be a predetermined direction by party leaders.

Gossip News Now reports that this development has sparked wider debate about transparency and fairness within internal party processes.

Ajose’s Argument: Process Must Match Decision

In his remarks, Samuel Ajose suggested that the sequence of events sends mixed signals. Rather than quoting his earlier statement directly, his position can be understood as follows: it is inconsistent for a party to encourage participation through the sale of forms while simultaneously leaning toward a consensus outcome.

He implied that such an approach could discourage genuine competition and weaken trust among party members.

Representing Marginalized Voices

Beyond the internal party dispute, Samuel Ajose tied his ambition to a broader cause—advocacy for underserved communities. He highlighted Badagry as a region that, in his view, has long been overlooked in Lagos politics.

His campaign, he indicated, is less about personal ambition and more about giving historically marginalized groups a stronger voice in governance.

Debate Over Consensus vs Competitive Primaries

The APC’s apparent preference for consensus has reignited discussions about internal democracy. While consensus is legally recognized, critics argue that it must follow clear procedures and broad consultation.

Ajose emphasized that both consensus and direct primaries are valid under Nigeria’s political framework, but insisted that whichever path is chosen must be transparent and inclusive.

Concerns About Fairness and Participation

Several key issues have emerged from the controversy:

Aspirants invested financially after purchasing nomination forms
The number and strength of contenders were still unclear before consensus talks
Stakeholders were not fully engaged in decision-making
Sudden shifts in direction risk creating internal divisions

These concerns reflect a deeper worry that the process may not adequately reflect the interests of all party members.

Call for Orderly and Inclusive Process

According to Samuel Ajose, any move toward consensus should involve structured dialogue and agreement among aspirants. He stressed that political contests should not be treated as conflicts but as organized competitions guided by fairness.

In essence, he advocates for a system where all participants feel respected, regardless of the final outcome.

Analysis: A Test of APC’s Internal Democracy

The situation in Lagos presents a critical test for the APC’s commitment to internal democracy. While consensus arrangements can help avoid prolonged disputes, they can also generate resentment if perceived as imposed or premature.

Balancing efficiency with inclusivity will be key. If not properly managed, the disagreement could create fractures within the party ahead of a crucial election cycle.

For now, the debate continues, with stakeholders watching closely to see whether party leadership will adjust its approach or proceed with its current strategy.

TAGS: Lagos APC Crisis