I Can Make Arrest Anytime Any Day; My Warrant Is My Badge – EFCC Boss Olukoyede Defends Forceful Operations

Spread the love

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has reaffirmed its authority to conduct arrests, including entering premises forcibly when pursuing suspects of financial crimes. EFCC Chairman Ola Olukoyede explained that such measures are legally sanctioned and comparable to practices used by international law enforcement agencies.

Speaking in a Channels Television interview, Olukoyede emphasized the agency’s commitment to following professional standards. “Look, if I need to break down a door to make an arrest, I will do that. Agencies like the FBI and NCA do the same. Why should our law be any different?” he said, addressing public criticism over EFCC operations.

Critics have questioned the commission’s aggressive tactics, particularly in cases involving cybercrime suspects, arguing that foreign agencies often adopt less confrontational methods. In response, Olukoyede appealed for public support, insisting that the EFCC’s work is vital to Nigeria’s security and anti-corruption efforts.

“It’s vital for us to appreciate our institutions and let them function. Foreigners won’t do it for us. We’ve conducted operations in collaboration with international counterparts, including the FBI and NCA, and the records speak for themselves,” Olukoyede said. He highlighted that the EFCC had hosted the FBI Director in Nigeria, who reviewed the agency’s procedures and recognized their professionalism.

The chairman further underscored that, under Nigerian law, EFCC operatives are empowered to make arrests without a conventional warrant. “The law, and the badge I carry, serve as my warrant. I can arrest anytime, any day, provided it’s within the conditions of the law,” he explained.

Analysis: Balancing Authority and Accountability

While the EFCC’s mandate grants broad powers, Olukoyede’s comments reignite debates about oversight and accountability. Legal experts note that forceful entries should be carefully documented and justified to prevent potential abuse of power. Nonetheless, his comparison to the FBI and NCA demonstrates the agency’s attempt to frame its actions within recognized international enforcement norms.

Observers suggest that public trust in anti-corruption bodies depends not only on results but also on transparency and adherence to procedural safeguards. By openly addressing concerns and citing collaboration with foreign agencies, the EFCC aims to bolster confidence in its operations while signaling that aggressive action remains a necessary tool in combating financial crimes.