Tinubu’s Government Has Become a ‘Kabiyesi’ System Where the President Is Untouchable

Spread the love

Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, who represents Abia South Senatorial District, has voiced strong criticism of the current administration led by President Bola Tinubu, describing the style of governance as one that discourages open criticism.

During an appearance on Channels Television, the lawmaker argued that the government has developed an atmosphere where the president’s decisions are rarely questioned.

According to Abaribe, such a political environment resembles what he described as a “Kabiyesi” system, a reference to traditional monarchical authority where the ruler is considered unquestionable.

He warned that this type of culture does not align with the principles of democratic governance, which rely on debate, accountability, and the freedom to challenge decisions made by those in power.

The senator explained that in a functioning democracy, dissenting opinions should be welcomed as part of the decision-making process.

In his view, criticism within government institutions should not automatically be interpreted as disloyalty or hostility toward the administration.

Abaribe also suggested that Nigeria has many capable individuals who could provide alternative leadership.

While discussing this point, he mentioned Peter Obi, the former presidential candidate of the Labour Party, as someone he believes could effectively lead the country.

According to the senator, the conversation about leadership should not revolve around a single individual but rather focus on the broader structure of governance.

He argued that concentrating excessive authority around one person risks weakening democratic institutions.

The lawmaker also expressed concern about what he described as the increasing visibility of members of the president’s family in matters related to governance.

Abaribe noted that Nigeria operates under a democratic system and should avoid practices that could give the impression of hereditary or family-based influence in government affairs.

To illustrate his point, he referred to the period when Peter Obi served as governor of Anambra State, stating that Obi’s family members rarely appeared in public discussions about state governance during that time.

He used this example to highlight what he believes should be a clear separation between public office and private family matters.

In addition to these criticisms, Abaribe addressed claims that he participates in singing the “On Your Mandate” song associated with the president during official events.

The senator firmly rejected the suggestion, stating that he does not take part in such displays.

He explained that during official ceremonies, particularly when the budget is presented at the National Assembly, he stands only for the national anthem.

According to him, if other lawmakers choose to sing political songs, he remains seated and does not join in.

Commentary and Analysis

Abaribe’s remarks highlight ongoing debates within Nigeria’s political landscape regarding the balance between executive authority and democratic accountability.

In many democracies, strong opposition voices play an important role in scrutinizing government policies and encouraging transparency.

Criticism from lawmakers, particularly those in opposition parties, often serves as a mechanism for holding the executive branch accountable.

The senator’s comments also reflect broader political competition, as different political camps position themselves ahead of future elections.

Discussions about alternative leadership figures, such as Peter Obi, indicate that political alignments and narratives for future electoral contests are already taking shape.

Ultimately, the exchange underscores the importance of open political dialogue in democratic systems, where differing perspectives contribute to the development of policies and governance practices.