Court Victory Opens New Chapter in ADC’s Dispute With Federal High Court Judge
The legal battle over the status of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has taken a fresh turn after the party formally petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC), seeking disciplinary action against Justice Peter Lifu following the reversal of his earlier judgment by the Court of Appeal.
Rather than ending with the appellate court’s decision, the dispute has now shifted to questions surrounding judicial accountability and the conduct of judges whose decisions are overturned on appeal.
The Latest Development
The petition was disclosed by the ADC’s legal counsel, Alex Adum, during an appearance on Arise Television’s Morning Show on Wednesday.
His comments followed Tuesday’s judgment by the Court of Appeal, which nullified the Federal High Court decision that ordered the deregistration of the ADC, Accord Party, and three other political parties.
According to the appellate court, those who filed the original lawsuit lacked the legal authority to challenge the continued registration of the affected political parties.
How the Legal Dispute Reached This Point
The controversy began after the Federal High Court ruled that five registered political parties should be deregistered.
That decision immediately generated legal debate because it questioned the continued existence of parties already recognised under Nigeria’s electoral framework.
However, the Court of Appeal later disagreed with the trial court’s position, holding that the suit itself was incompetent because the plaintiffs had no legal standing to institute the action.
The appellate court therefore set aside the entire judgment.
ADC’s Position After the Appeal
For the ADC, the appellate judgment represents more than a courtroom victory.
The party maintains that the decision reinforces constitutional safeguards protecting Nigeria’s multiparty democracy and affirms that political parties cannot lose their legal status through proceedings initiated by parties without the required legal standing.
Speaking on behalf of the party, Alex Adum welcomed the judgment, describing it as a significant affirmation of constitutional principles.
“The ADC has filed a petition against Justice Lifu. The Court of Appeal judgment on the ADC’s validity is a return to constitutionalism, the rule of law and multiparty democracy in Nigeria.”
Why the Party Wants NJC Intervention
Despite the appellate victory, the ADC believes the matter should not end with the reversal of the judgment.
The party argues that the National Judicial Council, which oversees judicial discipline in Nigeria, should examine the circumstances surrounding the Federal High Court ruling.
Adum described the judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu as judicial overreach and questioned why the court proceeded despite what he said was substantial evidence presented during the proceedings.
He further alleged that similar judicial practices were becoming increasingly common within parts of the Federal High Court and urged the NJC to activate its disciplinary mechanisms where appropriate.
The Broader Constitutional Question
The dispute now extends beyond the interests of a single political party.
It highlights two separate constitutional processes that operate independently within Nigeria’s legal system.
The first concerns the right of litigants to challenge court decisions through the appellate process.
The second relates to the responsibility of the National Judicial Council to examine allegations of judicial misconduct where formal complaints are submitted.
While the Court of Appeal has already settled the legal question regarding the deregistration ruling, the petition before the NJC concerns whether the conduct of the trial judge warrants administrative review under existing judicial procedures.
What the Appeal Court Decision Means
The appellate ruling leaves the affected political parties legally recognised unless another competent court reaches a different conclusion through due process.
It also reinforces the legal principle that courts must first determine whether litigants possess the necessary standing before deciding substantive constitutional issues.
For political parties, the judgment provides clarity regarding the legal protections surrounding their continued registration.
Looking Beyond the Case
Attention will now focus on whether the National Judicial Council decides to consider the ADC’s petition and, if so, what outcome may follow from its internal disciplinary process.
Regardless of the eventual decision, the case has become another reference point in ongoing discussions about judicial accountability, constitutional safeguards and the role of appellate courts in maintaining consistency within Nigeria’s justice system.
In Focus
- ADC has formally petitioned the National Judicial Council against Justice Peter Lifu.
- The action follows the Court of Appeal’s decision overturning the Federal High Court ruling on the deregistration of five political parties.
- The appellate court held that the original plaintiffs lacked the legal standing to bring the case.
- Alex Adum says the judgment strengthens constitutionalism, the rule of law and Nigeria’s multiparty democracy.
- The NJC will determine whether the petition warrants further disciplinary consideration.
© 2025 Gossip News Now, a division of CHIEJOS HARBIAN DIGITAL MEDIA LTD.
Contact us via admin@gossipnewsnow.online.
