The All Progressives Congress (APC) has intervened in the ongoing dispute over the attempted impeachment of the Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Olamide Oladiji, urging lawmakers involved in the matter to maintain the status quo while political consultations continue.

The intervention followed allegations of financial misconduct and abuse of office levelled against Oladiji by some lawmakers, including an allegation involving a ₦44 million transaction linked to the reordering of the 2026 budget of the Ondo State Oil Producing Areas Development Commission (OSOPADEC).

Oladiji has denied the allegations and described the impeachment move as politically motivated.

In Brief

• APC leaders and lawmakers involved in the Ondo Assembly dispute met to address the crisis.
• The party reportedly appealed to both sides to maintain peace while consultations continue.
• Lawmakers pushing for the Speaker’s impeachment were advised not to take further action for now.
• The intervention does not mean the allegations against Oladiji have been withdrawn.
• The impeachment matter remains unresolved as the APC’s mediation efforts continue.

Ondo Assembly Dispute

The dispute centres on the leadership of the Ondo State House of Assembly and allegations made against Speaker Olamide Oladiji.

Some lawmakers have accused the Speaker of financial misconduct and abuse of office, particularly in connection with an alleged ₦44 million transaction related to the reordering of the 2026 OSOPADEC budget.

The Speaker has consistently rejected the allegations, describing the attempt to remove him from office as politically motivated.

The disagreement subsequently prompted intervention from APC leaders as efforts were made to prevent the dispute from escalating further.

Timeline of Events

The controversy began with allegations against Oladiji over alleged financial misconduct and abuse of office.

An impeachment move was subsequently initiated by some lawmakers against the Speaker.

Oladiji denied the allegations and maintained that the move against him was politically motivated.

As tensions continued, APC leaders and lawmakers involved in the dispute met on Friday to seek a way of resolving the crisis.

Following the meeting, the party reportedly appealed to both sides to remain calm and allow its mediation efforts to continue.

Lawmakers pushing for the impeachment were also advised not to take further action pending the outcome of the consultations.

What Happened?

The APC’s intervention has created a temporary pause in the dispute rather than bringing the impeachment process to an end.

According to a source cited by Daily Trust, the party’s meeting was primarily aimed at calming both sides and preventing the disagreement from escalating.

The source said the party wanted the status quo maintained while its leadership continued consultations with those involved.

The intervention therefore provides a window for political mediation, but it does not resolve the allegations or determine the final outcome of the impeachment effort.

Lawmakers’ Reactions

Lawmakers pushing for Oladiji’s removal have raised allegations of financial misconduct and abuse of office against the Speaker.

However, the supplied report does not identify the individual lawmakers behind the impeachment effort or provide their separate statements beyond the allegations attributed to them.

The APC’s intervention reportedly asked those lawmakers to suspend further action temporarily while the mediation process continues.

The party’s position, as described by the source, is aimed at preventing another confrontation within the House while consultations take place.

APC’s Key Decision

The immediate decision arising from the APC intervention is for the parties involved to maintain the status quo while the political mediation process continues.

Lawmakers seeking the Speaker’s impeachment were reportedly asked to “sheath their swords” for now and refrain from taking further action.

The move is intended to create room for discussions between the different sides.

However, the party has not, according to the supplied report, withdrawn the allegations against Oladiji or formally ended the impeachment matter.

Stakeholder Positions

The lawmakers pushing for the impeachment have raised allegations concerning the Speaker’s conduct, including the reported ₦44 million transaction.

Olamide Oladiji, however, has denied the allegations and described the impeachment move as politically motivated.

The APC has taken a mediation position, asking both sides to remain calm and allow consultations to continue.

The party’s intervention therefore does not amount to an endorsement of either side’s claims.

Fact Check: What Has Changed?

The APC intervention has not withdrawn the impeachment matter.

The source quoted in the report specifically clarified that the lawmakers’ concerns had not been swept aside.

What has changed is that the party has created an opportunity for political intervention and asked the lawmakers involved to suspend further action while mediation continues.

Therefore, the current development should be understood as a temporary political intervention, not as the cancellation of the impeachment effort.

The allegations against Oladiji also remain allegations, while the Speaker’s denial remains his stated position.

Why the Dispute Matters

The dispute concerns the leadership of the Ondo State House of Assembly and could affect the stability of the legislature if the disagreement escalates.

A prolonged confrontation between lawmakers and the Speaker could create further tension within the House, while successful mediation could prevent the dispute from developing into another round of legislative confrontation.

For now, however, the supplied report does not establish any wider disruption to legislative activities or government operations.

Parliamentary Outlook

The immediate focus will be on the outcome of the APC’s consultations and whether the mediation process can resolve the issues raised by the lawmakers.

The lawmakers pushing for Oladiji’s impeachment have been asked to hold back from taking further action while the discussions continue.

The underlying allegations have not been withdrawn, and the impeachment matter remains unresolved.

The next significant development will therefore depend on whether the APC’s mediation efforts produce an agreement or whether the lawmakers eventually resume the impeachment process.