Five suspected members of the Ansaru terrorist group are expected before the Federal High Court in Abuja for re-arraignment over their alleged involvement in the abduction of pupils and teachers in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State.
The proceeding follows an earlier adjournment after one of the defendants objected to representation by a lawyer from the Legal Aid Council, insisting that a previously engaged counsel should continue handling the case.
The five suspects are facing a six-count amended charge filed on behalf of the Federal Government.
Why The Five Suspects Are Returning To Court
The defendants are expected to be re-arraigned on the amended charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/438/2026.
The case relates to the alleged abduction of pupils and teachers in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State on May 15. Two of the victims were reportedly killed during the incident, according to the information contained in the case report.
The amended charge was filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo, on behalf of the Federal Government.
The re-arraignment is taking place after the court was unable to proceed with the earlier scheduled arraignment.
Who Are The Five Defendants?
The five accused persons named in the charge are:
- Mahmud Muhammad, also known as Abu Bara’a and Abbas Mukhtar.
- Abubakar Abbas, also known as Isah Adam and Mallam Mahmuda Al-Nigeri.
- Abdulrazak Umar, also known as Abu Khalifa and Abu Khalid.
- Yunusa Musa, also known as Abu Yunusa Bin Musa.
- Shamsu Adamu Sani, also known as Abu Itisar.
They are being prosecuted in connection with the allegations contained in the amended charge.
Why The Earlier Arraignment Did Not Proceed
The previous attempt to arraign the five defendants was disrupted by an objection over legal representation.
A Deputy Director of the Legal Aid Council, Akilaluyel Shettima, had appeared in court as counsel for the five accused persons.
However, Mahmud Muhammad, speaking on behalf of the other defendants, told the court that they had previously engaged Bala Dakum as their lawyer and wanted him to continue representing them.
Muhammad said:
“We had been represented by Bala Dakum as our lawyer before, and we would want him to continue to defend us.”
The objection meant the court could not proceed with the planned arraignment at that sitting.
Prosecution Responds To The Defence Objection
The prosecution acknowledged the defendants’ position concerning legal representation.
Rotimi Oyedepo told the court that the defendants’ right to counsel of their choice was constitutionally protected.
He also said the Department of State Services was committed to due process and was not interested in persecuting the accused persons, but in ensuring that justice was served.
The response addressed the immediate dispute over who should represent the defendants before the proceedings could continue.
Judge Orders Access To Lawyer
Following the disagreement over legal representation, Justice Saliu Ibrahim adjourned the case until Thursday for the defendants to be re-arraigned.
The judge directed the suspects to contact Bala Dakum and ensure that he was available in court for the proceedings.
Justice Ibrahim also ordered the DSS to give the defendants access to their lawyer so they could prepare their defence in accordance with the law.
The order cleared the procedural issue that had prevented the earlier arraignment from going ahead.
What Happens Next In The Case?
The immediate next step is the re-arraignment of the five defendants before the Federal High Court in Abuja.
The proceedings will centre on the amended six-count charge filed against them by the Federal Government.
The court’s direction on legal representation also means the accused persons are expected to have access to the lawyer they requested before the proceedings continue.
At this stage, the allegations against the defendants remain allegations to be determined through the judicial process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are the five Ansaru suspects being re-arraigned?
They are expected to be re-arraigned on a six-count amended charge connected to their alleged involvement in the abduction of pupils and teachers in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State.
What happened during the previous arraignment attempt?
The earlier proceeding could not go ahead after Mahmud Muhammad objected to representation by a Legal Aid Council lawyer and requested that Bala Dakum continue representing the defendants.
Who filed the amended charge?
The amended charge was filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo, on behalf of the Federal Government.
Who are the five defendants?
They are Mahmud Muhammad, Abubakar Abbas, Abdulrazak Umar, Yunusa Musa and Shamsu Adamu Sani, who are also listed in the charge under several aliases.
What did the judge order concerning their lawyer?
Justice Saliu Ibrahim directed the suspects to contact Bala Dakum and ensure that he was available for the proceedings. The judge also ordered the DSS to allow the defendants access to their lawyer to prepare their defence.
Conclusion
The re-arraignment of the five suspected Ansaru members follows a procedural dispute over legal representation that prevented their earlier court appearance from proceeding.
With the judge directing that the defendants have access to their preferred lawyer, the case is expected to return to the Federal High Court in Abuja for the next stage of proceedings.
The allegations against the accused persons will now be addressed through the court process as the amended charge proceeds.
What do you think about the court’s decision to allow the defendants access to their preferred lawyer? Share your thoughts in the comments.
© 2025 Gossip News Now, a division of CHIEJOS HARBIAN DIGITAL MEDIA LTD.
Contact us via admin@gossipnewsnow.online
