‘Tinubu Other APC Leaders Should Apologize To Jonathan’ – Bayelsa PDP Lawmaker

Spread the love

A fresh political debate has emerged as Ted Elemeforo, Deputy Chief Whip of the Bayelsa State House of Assembly, openly challenged the leadership of the All Progressives Congress over what he described as inconsistency in governance.

Speaking during a televised interview, the lawmaker argued that the current administration’s stance on fuel subsidy contradicts its past position. He pointed out that key figures within the APC, including President Bola Tinubu, had previously opposed subsidy removal during the tenure of Goodluck Jonathan, only to now adopt a similar policy framework.

According to Gossip News Now, Elemeforo suggested that such a shift in position calls for accountability. He implied that those who once criticized the policy should acknowledge the reversal and take responsibility for their earlier stance.

In expressing his view, he conveyed that public figures who led protests or voiced strong opposition in the past now find themselves implementing the same measures. This, he indicated, reflects a pattern of double standards within Nigeria’s political space.

Beyond the subsidy issue, Elemeforo extended his criticism to the broader performance of the current government. He hinted at dissatisfaction with the administration’s handling of national challenges, suggesting that expectations have not been met in key areas.

He also revisited the political narrative that shaped the 2015 elections, noting that the APC had built its campaign on criticizing the previous administration. In his view, recent developments suggest that the ruling party is now grappling with similar issues it once condemned.

On the subject of political realignments, the Bayelsa lawmaker reaffirmed his commitment to the Peoples Democratic Party, despite ongoing defections across party lines. He emphasized that his loyalty is rooted in belief rather than convenience.

He further suggested that the PDP still holds the potential to provide viable solutions to Nigeria’s problems, positioning it as a credible alternative in the country’s political landscape.

Commentary and Analysis

Elemeforo’s remarks highlight a recurring theme in Nigerian politics — policy reversals and shifting narratives among political actors. The fuel subsidy debate, in particular, has long been a contentious issue, often exposing contradictions between campaign rhetoric and governance realities.

His call for an apology, while symbolic, underscores a deeper demand for political accountability and consistency. It raises questions about how leaders adapt to the complexities of governance after taking strong positions in opposition.

At the same time, his continued support for the PDP reflects the enduring competition between Nigeria’s major political parties. As defections reshape alliances, maintaining ideological clarity becomes increasingly important for parties seeking public trust.

Ultimately, the situation illustrates the evolving nature of Nigerian politics, where past positions are frequently tested by present responsibilities, and where credibility remains a key factor in shaping public perception.