Key takeaways

1. Sheikh Ahmad Gumi has expressed support for President Bola Tinubu’s decision to remove petrol subsidy.

2. Gumi warned that restoring subsidy without addressing corruption could encourage the diversion of public funds.

3. The cleric acknowledged that subsidy removal has created hardship for vulnerable Nigerians.

4. He urged the Federal Government to increase social spending to support poor households.

5. Gumi believes corruption control should be a priority in managing public resources.

6. His comments came during an interview with PAPShow while reacting to Atiku Abubakar’s promise to restore petrol subsidy.

Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi has expressed support for President Bola Tinubu’s decision to remove petrol subsidy in 2023, warning that restoring the policy without first addressing corruption could create further opportunities for the misuse of public funds.

Gumi maintained that although subsidy removal has contributed to economic hardship for many Nigerians, bringing back the policy without tackling corruption would not be the best solution.

Naija News reports that the cleric made his position known during an interview with PAPShow, where he reacted to former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar’s promise to restore petrol subsidy if elected president.

Gumi Explains Why Petrol Subsidy Should Not Be Restored

Gumi argued that reopening the petrol subsidy system without addressing corruption could expose public resources to further diversion.

According to the cleric, the government must first tackle corruption and ensure that public funds are properly managed before considering any move to restore the subsidy.

He warned that returning to the previous arrangement without addressing the problems associated with it could create another opportunity for financial mismanagement.

Gumi said:

If you reopen the subsidy system without first tackling corruption, you may simply create another opportunity for the diversion of public funds.

His position reflects concerns about the management of public resources and whether restoring the subsidy would adequately address the economic difficulties facing Nigerians.

Gumi Calls For Increased Social Spending To Protect Poor Nigerians

Despite supporting Tinubu’s decision to remove petrol subsidy, Gumi acknowledged that the policy has created serious financial difficulties for vulnerable citizens.

He argued that removing subsidies without providing adequate support for low-income households could worsen their economic circumstances.

The cleric therefore called on the government to increase social spending and introduce interventions that would help cushion the effects of subsidy removal.

Explaining his position, Gumi said:

There is nothing wrong with removing subsidies and increasing social spending to compensate vulnerable citizens. But when you remove subsidies without adequately compensating the poor through social interventions, you create serious hardship.

His comments highlight the importance of ensuring that economic reforms are accompanied by measures that protect Nigerians who are most affected by rising living costs.

Cleric Warns Against Restoring Subsidy Without Tackling Corruption

Gumi further cautioned against restoring petrol subsidy while corruption remains unaddressed.

He maintained that bringing back the policy without fixing the underlying problems could result in public money being wasted rather than benefiting ordinary Nigerians.

Reiterating his concerns, the cleric said:

Similarly, bringing back subsidies without addressing endemic corruption would amount to throwing money into a well.

His argument places corruption control and responsible management of public funds at the centre of the fuel subsidy debate.

The Wider Debate Over Fuel Subsidy Removal

The debate over petrol subsidy removal continues to raise questions about government spending, economic reforms and the protection of vulnerable households.

While Gumi supports the decision to remove the subsidy, his comments also highlight the need for the government to address the hardship experienced by Nigerians through effective social interventions.

His position is that retaining subsidy removal should go hand in hand with stronger measures to prevent corruption and ensure that public resources are used to support national development.

Ultimately, the debate involves more than whether petrol subsidy should be restored. It also raises questions about how government resources are managed and whether economic reforms can deliver meaningful relief to ordinary Nigerians.

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

1. What did Sheikh Ahmad Gumi say about Tinubu’s fuel subsidy removal?

Gumi supported President Tinubu’s decision to remove petrol subsidy, arguing that restoring it without tackling corruption could encourage the misuse of public funds.

2. Does Gumi support bringing back petrol subsidy in Nigeria?

No. Gumi cautioned against restoring petrol subsidy without first addressing corruption and the problems associated with the previous system.

3. Why does Gumi oppose restoring fuel subsidy without tackling corruption?

He believes reopening the subsidy system without addressing corruption could create further opportunities for the diversion of public funds.

4. What did Gumi say about the hardship caused by subsidy removal?

He acknowledged that removing subsidy without adequately compensating vulnerable Nigerians through social interventions creates serious hardship.

5. What solution did Gumi recommend for poor Nigerians?

He urged the government to increase social spending and provide adequate support for vulnerable citizens affected by subsidy removal.

6. Who did Gumi respond to during the interview?

He was responding to former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar’s promise to restore petrol subsidy if elected president.

7. Where did Gumi make his comments?

He made the remarks during an interview with PAPShow.

© 2025 Gossip News Now, a division of CHIEJOS HARBIAN DIGITAL MEDIA LTD.