Nigerians who put money into PXES, an online investment platform, are reportedly struggling to recover their funds after payments stopped and access to the platform became difficult.
According to Saturday PUNCH, the payment disruption began in early September, leaving participants who had invested amounts ranging from tens of thousands of naira to millions unable to withdraw as expected.
The situation has triggered anger among investors, with reported visits to PXES offices in Adamawa and Kogi states and incidents in which some participants removed office equipment while attempting to recover their money.
Key Takeaways
- PXES investors reportedly began experiencing payment problems in early September.
- Participants said they invested amounts ranging from about ₦21,600 to hundreds of thousands of naira, with some reportedly committing more than ₦1 million.
- The platform reportedly advertised returns ranging from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, while some promotional materials allegedly indicated returns as high as 120 per cent.
- Investors described a membership system involving online dashboards, daily tasks or “orders” and different investment levels.
- Some PXES offices were reportedly found closed or abandoned after withdrawals became difficult.
- The supplied report does not establish the total amount lost by all participants or provide an independent determination of the platform’s legal status.
How the PXES Crisis Unfolded
The problems emerged after investors who had previously received payments began encountering difficulties withdrawing their earnings.
Participants said the platform had initially provided a system through which members could receive returns after completing activities on their dashboards. But as withdrawals became unavailable, concerns quickly spread among those who had committed money to the scheme.
In Yola, Adamawa State, and Kabba, Kogi State, frustrated investors reportedly visited PXES offices following the payment problems.
Videos circulating online showed people removing chairs, tables and other items from the company’s Yola premises. Similar scenes were reportedly witnessed at the Kabba office.
One man seen in a circulating video reportedly said he had invested about ₦209,000 and was unable to recover the money.
The situation became even more concerning for some Kabba participants after the office manager reportedly sent a message promising compensation for investors’ patience. According to the report, the office was then closed about three days later.
That left affected participants with little clarity about the whereabouts of the operators or the status of their funds.
The Money Investors Say They Lost
For many participants, the crisis was not simply about missing profits. Their original investments were also at risk.
Bunmi Awodipe said friends introduced her to PXES after showing her evidence that they had been receiving payments from the platform.
She said she invested ₦200,000 and initially received ₦7,000 every week, but the payments lasted only three weeks.
Awodipe told Saturday PUNCH that she later went to the company’s office after the payments stopped, only to find it locked and apparently empty.
Her experience was similar to that of Deji Mulero, who said one of his customers introduced him to PXES.
Mulero said he registered with ₦65,000 on September 4, but the platform stopped functioning shortly afterwards.
“It’s one of my customers who introduced this thing to me on September 4. I registered with ₦65,000 and it crashed the same Friday. That was how I lost my money.”
Another participant identified as Wale said he invested ₦207,000 and had seen his dashboard balance rise to almost ₦600,000 before the platform stopped operating.
His account highlights an important distinction in the investors’ experiences: amounts displayed on an online dashboard were not necessarily funds that participants were ultimately able to withdraw.
One Investor Expected the Money for School Expenses
Among the affected participants was 68-year-old Jumoke Talabi, who said she joined PXES hoping the returns would help with her granddaughter’s school expenses and household needs.
Talabi said she invested ₦64,800 after seeing other participants receive payments. She had previously received about ₦70,000 from the platform, which encouraged her to increase her investment.
She was expecting another payment when the withdrawal period arrived but said no money reached her account.
According to Talabi, she had expected to receive ₦18,000 before the resumption of school.
“I was meant to collect ₦18,000 before school resumes, and I thought that I would finish collecting all my profit. But so far, I have not collected any money.”
She also described the emotional effect of the situation on people around her.
“One of my friends doesn’t know what to do or where to go. She has been crying.”
Talabi said financial hardship had influenced her decision to participate.
“It’s poverty that made me do it. If not poverty, I would not, because the money is meant for school fees.”
Her account illustrates how expectations of quick returns can become particularly consequential when participants commit money intended for essential household needs.
What Investors Were Promised
The reported PXES model appeared attractive to participants partly because of the returns associated with different investment packages.
According to promotional materials reviewed by Saturday PUNCH, some packages were advertised as offering returns of between 25 per cent and 50 per cent, while other claims reportedly indicated returns as high as 120 per cent.
The materials reportedly listed packages beginning from ₦21,600, with higher levels including ₦64,800 and ₦207,000.
One promotional claim indicated that a ₦21,600 investment could generate as much as ₦259,200 over 360 days, while ₦64,800 could reportedly produce up to ₦777,600 over the same period.
Those figures represented returns several times greater than the original amounts invested.
Such claims formed part of the attraction for participants, particularly where existing members were able to demonstrate that they had received payments during the platform’s earlier operations.
Inside the PXES Membership System
Interviews with participants and promotional materials reviewed by Saturday PUNCH indicated that PXES operated a tiered membership structure.
Participants paid different amounts to register and were then given access to an online dashboard.
Funmi Deinde, one of the participants interviewed, said the platform had membership levels including Star 1, Star 2 and Star 3.
According to her, some of the entry packages included ₦21,600, ₦54,800 and ₦207,000.
After registration, members were given access to what participants described as daily “orders” or tasks displayed on their dashboards.
Deinde said products such as household items appeared on the dashboard and members were instructed to interact with them.
“When you join with this money, you have an account, a dashboard that you’ll be taking orders from every day.”
She explained that participants did not necessarily receive the products physically.
Instead, she said the registration payment secured membership and access to the online task system.
The withdrawal arrangement reportedly changed over time. Deinde said members were initially able to withdraw earnings daily, with different minimum amounts available for withdrawal.
She said the system later moved to weekly withdrawals as participation increased, with withdrawal days eventually linked to members’ investment levels.
Another participant, Emmanuel Ajayi, said the ₦64,000 package generated about ₦2,160 from the daily tasks, while the ₦21,600 package reportedly generated about ₦720.
Recruitment Helped Bring in More Investors
The platform’s reported recruitment structure also played a role in attracting participants.
Shola Adeshina, whose wife invested in PXES, said stories about members making substantial money encouraged others to join.
According to him, some people were persuaded by claims that participants had used money earned from the platform to buy cars or build houses.
This type of word-of-mouth promotion appears repeatedly in the accounts of participants interviewed for the report.
Awodipe, for instance, said she relied on friends who showed her evidence of previous payments before deciding to invest.
A security guard also described being introduced to PXES by his sister. Although he initially hesitated, repeated persuasion eventually led him to invest ₦64,000.
He said he managed to withdraw approximately ₦20,000 on two occasions before payments stopped.
The security guard further claimed that his sister, who had developed a larger network within the platform, lost more than ₦1 million after the collapse.
These accounts suggest that personal relationships and demonstrations of earlier payouts were significant parts of how participants became involved.
When the Withdrawals Stopped
The central problem for investors emerged when the payment system no longer operated as expected.
Participants who had previously been able to receive money said they were suddenly unable to make withdrawals. The platform subsequently became inaccessible to some users, while offices linked to PXES were reportedly closed or emptied.
The developments also prompted investors who had committed larger sums to visit company premises in search of answers.
According to Adeshina, some people who had invested millions of naira visited an office after payments were suspended and allegedly found the premises abandoned.
At the same time, the reported removal of office equipment in Yola and Kabba showed how frustrated some participants had become as they sought ways to recover their money.
However, the supplied report does not establish that the removal of office property resulted in the recovery of investors’ funds.
What Remains Unclear
Several important questions remain unanswered from the information available in the supplied report.
It is not clear how much money was invested in PXES by participants nationwide or the total amount that may have become inaccessible after payments stopped.
The report also does not establish where the operators of the platform currently are or whether affected investors will ultimately recover their funds.
There is also no independent regulatory or court determination in the supplied material establishing the legal classification of PXES as a Ponzi scheme.
What is clear from the accounts is that participants who had previously received payments say they were subsequently unable to access expected withdrawals, while some physical offices were reportedly closed or abandoned.
That distinction is important when assessing the situation because an investment platform’s reported payment failure, the losses claimed by individual participants and any eventual legal determination are separate matters.
Why the PXES Collapse Matters to Investors
The reported experience of PXES participants highlights the financial risks that can arise when people commit money based heavily on promised returns or evidence of earlier payouts.
Several participants said they were encouraged by friends, relatives or customers who had apparently received money from the platform.
But earlier successful withdrawals did not guarantee that later participants would be able to recover their capital or accumulated balances.
For investors, the accounts also demonstrate why an amount displayed as earnings on an online dashboard should not automatically be treated as cash that can be withdrawn.
The reported losses ranged from tens of thousands of naira to more than ₦1 million in individual cases, with some participants saying they had invested money intended for school fees and household expenses.
The Questions Investors Are Now Facing
The immediate concern for affected PXES participants is no longer how much they could earn from the platform.
It is whether the money they already committed can be recovered.
For those who previously received payments, the sudden change in withdrawal access has also raised questions about how the platform was funded, how its returns were generated and what happened when the payment system stopped.
Those questions cannot be answered conclusively from the participant accounts and promotional materials contained in the supplied report.
For now, investors are left seeking clarity over their funds as the reported PXES payment crisis continues to unfold.
The case also underscores the importance of examining how an investment platform generates its advertised returns, understanding withdrawal conditions and assessing the risks before committing money—particularly when promised returns are substantially higher than the original investment.










